• TwoTigers24, New York
  • October 29, 2026

0 Comments

“INDO” has been dropped from “INDOPACOM”. The US Department of Defense’s decision to rename its Indo-Pacific Command back to Pacific Command has sparked questions about the future of one of the most influential strategic concepts in modern geopolitics. First championed by then-Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in the early 2000s, it was later institutionalized as official US policy during President Donald Trump’s first term through the 2018 renaming of PACOM to INDOPACOM. This new name reflected the idea that India is an important strategic partner of the US and its allies, and that the Indian and Pacific oceans form a single strategic theater. The latest change comes as Trump met Indian PM Narendra Modi at the G7. Is this a symbolic shift, or does it reveal something deeper about Washington’s approach to China and Asia? In this episode, we examine the significance of the PACOM name change, the legacy of Abe’s Indo-Pacific vision and what it means for regional security.

Source: ‘USPACOM’ Name Change: What It Means For China, India, Quad | Taiwan Talks EP859

Summary

The United States Department of Defense has decided to rename its Indo-Pacific Command back to Pacific Command, removing the word "Indo" from the title. This decision follows a meeting between President Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the G7 summit. The original inclusion of "Indo" in the command's name was established during Donald Trump's first term in 2018, reflecting a strategic view that treated the Indian and Pacific Oceans as a single theater with India as a key partner. This concept was initially championed by former Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in the early 2000s before becoming official US policy. The recent change raises questions about whether this represents a symbolic shift or indicates a deeper alteration in Washington's approach to China and Asia. The episode explores the legacy of Abe's Indo-Pacific vision, the significance of the name change for regional security, and how US allies have promoted the concept. Recorded on June 18, 2026, the discussion features guests including Chenlung Kuo, Sana Hashmi, and Tsai Jung-hsiang to analyze these developments in geopolitics and defense strategy.

Watch “‘USPACOM’ Name Change: What It Means For China, India, Quad | Taiwan Talks EP859” on YouTube

Author

YNOT — Two Tigers Consulting From Building Bridges to Watching China About 15 years ago, I founded a small company called Two Tigers Consulting with a relatively simple idea: help American and Chinese businesses work together. At the time, China represented one of the greatest business opportunities in the world — a rapidly expanding economy, extraordinary manufacturing capabilities, and ambitious entrepreneurs eager to build relationships with American companies. Two Tigers Consulting was created to help bridge that gap. For a while, it worked. We attended trade shows, arranged meetings, and introduced companies across both cultures. But after one particularly promising trade show, several Chinese businesspeople we had met were reportedly arrested upon returning to China — apparently for traveling without proper authorization. That experience taught me something important: in China, being a successful entrepreneur doesn't necessarily mean being free to conduct business. As Xi Jinping consolidated power and the political environment shifted, we concluded the potential rewards of doing business in China no longer justified the risks. Rather than abandon our knowledge entirely, Two Tigers evolved into a platform for following, discussing, and analyzing developments inside China — its economy, political leadership, and increasingly complicated relationship with the United States. I want to make absolutely clear that I have tremendous respect for the Chinese people — their entrepreneurs, engineers, and workers are extraordinarily capable. But I also believe China's political system creates fundamental contradictions: enormous private fortunes can be accumulated, yet ultimate political authority remains firmly concentrated, making relationships based on mutual trust and predictable rules extremely difficult to sustain. Today, Two Tigers is an independent publication examining China's achievements, challenges, ambitions, and contradictions — where they intersect with the United States and the broader world. What began as a small business venture now attracts roughly 10,000 visits a day. Understanding China is no longer optional: what happens there affects businesses, economies, and people throughout the world. And that is why Two Tigers continues.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Quantum24 Network