United States Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer said on Monday that China’s manipulative trade practices and economic model represent an “unprecedented threat’. (Paul Huang/The Epoch Times)United States Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer said on Monday that China’s manipulative trade practices and economic model represent an “unprecedented threat’. (Paul Huang/The Epoch Times)

China’s manipulative trade practices and economic model represent an “unprecedented threat” to the world’s market-based economy and U.S. interests, said the incumbent United States Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer in a speech on Monday.

It was the first major public speech given by Lighthizer, a long term critic of China’s trade practices against the United States. Lighthizer told a crowd of over a hundred at the Center for Strategic and International Studies that China represents the one challenge facing the administration that is “substantially more difficult than those faced in the past.”

“The sheer scale of their coordinated efforts to develop their economy, to subsidize, to create ‘National Champions,’ to force technology transfers, and to destroy market, in China and throughout the world, is a threat to world trading system that is unprecedented,” said Lighthizer.

Lighthizer was referring to the hundreds if not thousands of Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOE) that are institutionally protected and promoted by the Chinese regime, hence known as the “national champions” of the Chinese economy.

Not only do Chinese state-owned enterprises receive extensive protection from the Chinese regime against foreign competition, they are also often the culprits in stealing technology and other intellectual properties from foreign companies. Large number of American companies have fallen victim to such abusive tactics by the Chinese, which has resulted in massive job losses on the part of American workers, according to Lighthizer and many other critics of China’s trade practices.

“Unfortunately the World Trade Organization is not equipped to deal with this problem,” Lighthizer said, “WTO and its predecessors, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), were not designed to successfully manage mercantilism on this scale.”

“We must find other ways to defend our companies, workers, farmers, and indeed, our economic system,” said Lighthizer, “We must find ways to ensure our market-based economy prevails.”

Cargo ships berth at a port in Qingdao, east China's Shandong Province on June 8, 2016. (STR / AFP / Getty Images)

Abusive trade practices by the Chinese state-owned enterprises have inflicted significant harm on American companies and will be dealt with by the Trump administration, according to U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer. Photo showing cargo ships berthed at a port in Qingdao, Chiny. (STR / AFP / Getty Images)

Lighthizer did not reveal specifics of the ongoing investigation regarding China’s alleged theft of intellectual property, a process that was started by President Trump on Aug. 14. He revealed, jednak, that the investigators receive “an awful lot of complaints” from executives of American companies that were hurt by the abusive practices of the Chinese, with many complaining that they were forced to give up their technology and corporate secrets to their Chinese competitors.

Trump Continues Hawkish Stance

Lighthizer’s comment on Monday represents the latest signal that Trump’s campaign pledge of a hardline trade policy against China remains steadfast, despite the departure on Aug. 19 of White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon, who was widely thought to be the administration’s primary advocate of a hawkish stance against China.

Lighthizer is not the only “trade hawk” inside Trump’s administration. Peter Navarro, an economist who is also known for outspoken criticism of the Chinese regime and of China’s trade practices against the United States, was selected by President Donald Trump to head the newly created National Trade Council and is believed to be playing a key role in forming the Trump administration’s trade policies.

Przeczytaj cały artykuł tutaj

Tourists walk with their luggage at Beijing International Airport on November 24, 2016.
(Fred Dufour / AFP / Getty Images)Tourists walk with their luggage at Beijing International Airport on November 24, 2016.
(Fred Dufour / AFP / Getty Images)

Having left her native China and entered the United States via a smuggling ring in 2014, Zheng Lili recalls the climax of her months-long journey, which took her around the world and cost tens of thousands of dollars.

“I was scared to death, gasping for breath, I thought I would die there.” It was at that very moment, after she crossed the Rio Grande, that she heard police officers say, “Welcome to America!”

Her first stop was Moscow. From there she went to Cuba, where a visa is not required for Chinese nationals staying less than a month, before finally arriving in Mexico City and embarking on their trek journey north.

At Mexican customs, the leader of the group Zheng was in had told everyone to slip $200 into his or her passport. They were then led to a special entryway and got through without trouble. Joined by a dozen others from different countries, they set off at midnight on a journey to the Rio Grande Valley. For two days straight, they marched over the mosquito-infested land, constantly ready to throw themselves to the ground to evade helicopters or patrol vehicles.

Zheng had become so exhausted that she had to be carried by her son and another immigrant. “We all looked forward to being arrested after crossing, because it speeds up the process,” she told The Epoch Times.

Her son was released on bail a month later, and was soon granted political asylum on account of the Christian faith he learned from his devout grandmother. Zheng was detained for two years.

Zheng Lili’s experience isn’t unique. Aug. 26 this year, twenty-three Chinese were arrested crossing San Diego’s Otay Mesa border, the largest bust of illegal entry by Chinese nationals via Mexico.

Along with seven Mexicans, the group was discovered while they were going through a cross-country tunnel from Mexico. All came from southeastern China—22 from the coastal province of Fujian and one from the neighboring province of Guangdong.

Zheng, also from Fujian, arrived in the United States in 2014 and spent two years in detention before she was reunited with her husband in 2016. Her husband, Chen Zhiqiang, was himself an illegal immigrant: he had gained entry over two decades earlier with a fake passport obtained in the Netherlands. Chen and Zheng were the last of 39 Chen-surnamed families in their town that left home for the United States.

Fujian has historically been one of the largest sources for Chinese immigrants. Changle District, which in the late 1970s became one of the first Chinese ports opened up for international trade, gained the nickname “Village of Smugglers.” From 1980 do 2005, koniec 200,000 people had been trafficked to overseas destinations, according to Sina, an online Chinese media group.

In Fuzhou, capital of Fujian, tens of thousands of “left-behind children” lived with their grandparents, according to Beijing News. The parents—unauthorized immigrants working in the United States—sent their toddlers back because they had no extra energy or time to take care of them after toiling for 13 hours a day or more. Changle District, which lies near Fuzhou and has around 712,500 residents, counted 5,000 U.S.-born children in 2012. Nearly every local household had someone living overseas.

Fujian has a long tradition of emigration, beginning in antiquity as Chinese merchants left the mainland and settled abroad, often in Southeast Asia. In the early 1960s, Fujianese sailors who took work in Hong Kong discovered that they could earn 15 times as much in the United States, sparking a first wave of emigration to the West.

Gradually an extensive network and an industry of smuggling developed. “When other people got out and we didn’t, it made us look bad,” unnamed immigrants told Sohu, another Chinese media site. Villagers in Changle would set off fireworks to celebrate whenever someone made it to the United States.

“There have been lots of historical cases of Chinese people being brought into the United States illegally on ships, in railroad coaches, hidden in cars, through tunnels, on airplanes – every imaginable way that humans can think of to cross the border,” Elliot Young, a history professor at Portland, Oregon’s Lewis and Clark College and author of the book “Alien Nation,” which documents China’s immigration history to the United States, told Voice of America.

“The Chinese were among the first to invent these ways of evading border control,” Elliott Young said.

Zheng Qi (not related to Zheng Lili), chairman of the Fukien Benevolent Association of America, made his way into America with a Thailand tourist passport, according to U.S.-China Press. In his unsuccessful first attempt, the Hong Kong-based travel agency got him a travel visa to Canada, which got him to the Canadian border before he was discovered and repatriated.

The Migration Policy Institute estimates about 268,000 illegal or undocumented immigrants from China, making them the fifth largest group among over 11 million illegal immigrants residing in the United States, and the largest of all non-Latin American nations. W 2016 raport, the MPI identified China as one of the world’s leading sources of immigrants.

Over a period of seven months from October 2016 to this May, the California border patrol apprehended 663 Chinese trying to illegally enter the United States, a huge jump from a mere 48 over the same period in 2016, and just 5 the year before, NBC 7 Podawane.

Smugglers see Chinese clients as more profitable than those from Latin America or Mexico, since gangs can demand higher fees due to the longer travel route. In the past few decades, the cost of smuggling an immigrant has more than doubled, rising from $30,000 do $50,000 do $70,000, according to the Council on Foreign Relations.

Rarely are these fees paid upfront to smugglers, called shetou or “snakeheads” in Chinese, according to the professor Elliott Young.

Young observed that the immigrants would usually arrange with the smuggler on a certain amount of down payment—around a few thousand dollars—and “work off their debt in the United States by working in a business.” “They work in restaurants, garment factories and other, often Chinese-owned, businesses," powiedział.

A sarcastic Chinese expression describes a typical illegal immigrant’s day-to-day life upon arriving the United States: “Daytime at the stove, nighttime on the pillow, and weekend at the lawyer’s.”

Przeczytaj cały artykuł tutaj

Dan Blumenthal (center), Director of Asian Studies at the American Enterprise Institute, speaks at a discussion on U.S-Korea relations at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, on Sept. 5, 2017, w Waszyngtonie. (Paul Huang/The Epoch Times)Dan Blumenthal (center), Director of Asian Studies at the American Enterprise Institute, speaks at a discussion on U.S-Korea relations at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, on Sept. 5, 2017, w Waszyngtonie. (Paul Huang/The Epoch Times)

WASHINGTON – In the aftermath of last week’s nuclear test by North Korea that allegedly detonated a hydrogen bomb, experts suggest that the time is now for the United States to apply overwhelming pressures on China so as to force it into giving up the rough Kim regime and put an end to its seemly-endless provocations and aggressions.

Dan Blumenthal, Director of Asian Studies at the American Enterprise Institute, said on Tuesday that it is possible for the United States and China to reach an agreement over the future of the Korean Peninsula, provided that United States “makes China feel so much pain over its relationship with North Korea” so that China would eventually give up its support for the totalitarian Kim Jong-un regime.

Among a panel of experts that participated in the discussion on U.S.-South Korea strategy hosted by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) on Sept. 5, all agreed that a unification of the Korean Peninsula under the democratic rule of the South Korea should be desired “end goal” for both the United States and South Korea. jednak, Dan Blumenthal was the most vocal when it came to advocating a hardline policy against China over its support for North Korea.

“What we need to do, and what we have done effectively, is to scare China,” said Dan Blumenthal, „[The United States should] make China very scared, and on its heels about what we are going to do, and what we are capable of doing.”

Blumenthal also said that Trump’s approach to North Korea is more or less on the right trajectory: “The policy adopted by the Trump administration right now is to tie North Korea as a liability for China, to make China feel so much pain for its relations with North Korea,” said Blumenthal, “at some point China would say, enough is enough.”

“China will help get rid of Kim regime, and give him a nice villa in Shenyang, with Dennis Rodman as his companion,” said Blumenthal.

After North Korea’s sixth nuclear test on Sunday, President Trump vowed that the United States will stop all trade with any country doing business with North Korea. China is currently North Korea’s biggest trading partner. Previously Trump has said many times that he was “disappointed” in China for not helping stop North Korea’s nuclear aggressions.

A B-1B long range strategic bomber in a file photo. In July this year the U.S. flew two of the bombers over the North Korean penninsula in a demonstration of force. Michael Green, the senior vice president for Asia and Japan Chair at CSIS, said that China needs to be compelled to change through a forcible approach, such as building the fear of a U.S. attack on North Korea in the minds of the Chinese regime rulers. (Courtesy USAF/Getty Images)

A B-1B long range strategic bomber in a file photo. In July this year the U.S. flew two of the bombers over the North Korean penninsula in a demonstration of force. Michael Green, the senior vice president for Asia and Japan Chair at CSIS, said that China needs to be compelled to change through a forcible approach, such as building the fear of a U.S. attack on North Korea in the minds of the Chinese regime rulers. (Courtesy USAF/Getty Images)

Michael Green, the senior vice president for Asia and Japan Chair at CSIS, said that he would substitute the word “incentivize” for the word “scare.” However, Green also acknowledged that China needs to be compelled to change through a forcible approach, such as building the fear of a U.S. attack [on North Korea] in the minds of the Chinese regime rulers.

Other experts expressed more doubt over the possibility that the Chinese regime’s behavior could be changed. Laura Rosenberger, Director of Alliance for Securing Democracy said, “I am more pessimistic on it. We forget that [the Chinese regime] has a communist party leadership. That’s an existential issue.”

Przeczytaj cały artykuł tutaj

Chinese President Xi Jinping in Xiamen, southeastern China's Fujian Province, on Sept. 5, 2017.
(WU HONG/AFP/Getty Images)Chinese President Xi Jinping in Xiamen, southeastern China's Fujian Province, on Sept. 5, 2017.
(WU HONG/AFP/Getty Images)

North Korea declared that it tested its sixth nuclear bomb on Sept. 3, a move emphatically condemned by UN Secretary General António Guterres and U.S. President Donald Trump, who threatened to stop trading with any country doing business with the reclusive communist country.

Of all the countries that have diplomatic ties with North Korea, Trump’s threat probably hits closest to home for the Chinese regime, North Korea’s largest and historically most loyal ally.

Over the years, China has supported its communist neighbor, fearing that a collapse of the Kim regime would send thousands of refugees pouring into the country.

The Chinese regime also uses North Korea as a bargaining chip with the United States, claiming that China is the only one that can bring North Korea to the table, says Chen Pokong, a China current affairs analyst.

But the Chinese regime also doesn’t want to deal with the backlash and instability in the region that North Korea has created.

<a href="http://img.theepochtimes.com/n3/eet-content/uploads/2017/07/12/GettyImages-689969574.jpg" class="light-box" data-lightbox="59aefff3999db" data-title="The test fire of a ballistic missile at an undisclosed location in North Korea in an undated photo released by North Korea’s official Korean Central News Agency on May 30, 2017.
(STR / AFP / Getty Images)”>The test fire of a ballistic missile at an undisclosed location in North Korea in an undated photo released by North Korea's official Korean Central News Agency on May 30, 2017.  (STR / AFP / Getty Images)

The test fire of a ballistic missile at an undisclosed location in North Korea in an undated photo released by North Korea’s official Korean Central News Agency on May 30, 2017.
(STR / AFP / Getty Images)

For these reasons, Beijing has shown its disapproval of North Korea’s brinkmanship, but at the same time, has not done a great deal to stop it.

Chinese leader Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin, who were at a summit in China during the most recent nuclear test, both ambiguously vowed to “appropriately deal” with” the North’s provocations, according to Chinese-state-run media.

When North Korea fired a missile over Japan on Aug. 29, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying called for restraint from all parties and for everyone to study the “relevant resolutions by the UN Security Council.”

This raises the question of whether China, in the event of an all-out conflict, would ultimately take the side of the United States or its maverick neighbor.

While the Chinese regime under Mao signed a pact with North Korea in 1961 that obliged China to come to North Korea’s aid in the event of an attack, Xi’s administration has begun to show signs of ending China’s long-standing support for the Kim regime.

Earlier in August, China approved UN sanctions against North Korea after Trump put significant pressure on Beijing to rein in its rogue neighbor.

Beijing also announced in mid-August that it would ban imports of products like coal, fish, and iron from North Korea starting Sept. 5—a significant move considering that about 90 percent of North Korea’s export income comes from trade with China.

China has also reportedly been fortifying its border with North Korea by sending more troops to the region, holding military drills, and gathering intelligence through 24-7 surveillance.

At the same time, China has declared that it “will never allow chaos and war on the peninsula,” according to China’s representative to the UN.

Further aggravating North Korea’s relationship with China is Pyongyang’s timing. Both the missile over Japan and the nuclear test come close to the Chinese regime’s 19th Party Congress, a once-in-five-year event at which China’s new leadership is chosen.

“The Chinese Communist Party needs to create a stable environment [ahead of the 19th Party Congress],” said Chen Pongkong. “That means the CCP is willing to compromise with others, even submit to humiliation. [North Korean leader] Kim Jong Un sees this, so he always picks this most crucial time to be provocative.”

NAS. President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping walk together at the Mar-a-Lago estate in West Palm Beach, Fla., w kwietniu 7, 2017. (JIM WATSON/AFP/Getty Images)

NAS. President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping walk together at the Mar-a-Lago estate in West Palm Beach, Fla., w kwietniu 7, 2017. (JIM WATSON/AFP/Getty Images)

When Trump and Xi met in person for the first time in April, North Korea was one of the topics of conversation. Coming out of that, Trump said he better understood the complexity of China’s situation and was optimistic that Xi would help the United States deal with North Korea.

“They have pressures that are tough pressures, and I understand. And you know, don’t forget, Chiny, over the many years, has been at war with Korea—you know, wars with Korea. It’s not like, ‘Oh, gee, you just do whatever we say.’ They’ve had numerous wars with Korea,” he told White House reporters in July.

Although the Chinese regime has agreed to cooperate with the United States to sanction North Korea, their starting points differ. The Chinese regime advocates all sides coming to the table, whereas the United States wants North Korea to abandon its nuclear program before it will sit down to talks.

Recently however, Trump has hinted that negotiations, whether North Korea lays down its nuclear arsenal or not, are futile.

“North Korea is a rogue nation which has become a great threat and embarrassment to China, which is trying to help but with little success,” he tweeted Sept. 3. “South Korea is finding, as I have told them, that their talk of appeasement with North Korea will not work, they only understand one thing!”

What Kim Wants

Analysts believe that Kim Jong Un craves the respect that comes with being recognized as a nuclear power, and has no interest in abandoning its nuclear weapons.

“While geographically a small nation, if it is a big nuclear nation, the Kim empire—his dictator regime—will last forever. So Kim is pursuing the stability of his regime,” Chen Pongkong said.

“North Korea’s ultimate goal is to force the United States to accept it as a nuclear state, and to be able to talk to the United States on this basis,” said NTD TV’s East Asia political affairs analyst Wen Zhao.

North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un (C) in Pyongyang on Fe. 22, 2017. (STR / AFP / Getty Images)

North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un (C) in Pyongyang on Fe. 22, 2017. (STR / AFP / Getty Images)

jednak, it doesn’t look likely that the United States and other nuclear nations will willingly allow North Korea to be a nuclear power.

If Trump carries through on his threat to cut trade ties with North Korea’s backers, he could be looking at a trade war with one of the United States’ largest trading partners—China.

Trump has made no secret about the fact that he wants to re-negotiate trade deals with the world’s second largest economy, saying to reporters in July, “I’ve been going a little bit easier [on China] because I’d like to have their help … But we have to fix the trade with China because it’s very, very non-reciprocal.”

“In terms of North Korea, our strength is trade," on dodał.

The United States is China’s largest importer. If Trump follows through with his threats, the Chinese regime could be forced to choose between the survival of its own economy and that of North Korea’s.

“Once the pressure is high enough, I believe the Xi government will choose the option with the least negative consequences,” said Chen Kuide, the chief editor of China in Perspective, a digital Chinese language magazine out of Princeton that covers China’s democracy movement and rights issues.

From NTD.tv

NTD News’ Tina Lin contributed to this article.

Przeczytaj cały artykuł tutaj

NAS. Rozpustnik. Jim BridenstineNAS. Rozpustnik. Jim Bridenstine

Longtime space advocate Rep. Jim Bridenstine (R-Okla.) has been nominated by President Trump to be the next administrator of NASA. Birdenstine is known for his strong support for a new manned mission to the Moon, and for his belief that the United States needs to challenge China’s ever-expanding presence in space.

The nomination of the former Navy pilot and three-term Congressman from Oklahoma has been expected for some time, and was finally announced on Sept. 1. Previously, Trump tasked Vice President Mike Pence to lead a re-established the National Space Council aimed at reinvigorating and reasserting the U.S. presence in the space.

Bridenstine has been an active voice in the Congress for increasing the U.S. commitment to the space program. W 2016 Bridenstine introduced H.R. 4945, the American Space Renaissance Act, which sought to reform and modernize the U.S. space program in a comprehensive manner. While the act did not move forward, some of its elements were incorporated into later legislation.

The nomination could face a challenge in the Senate and has already prompted criticism from Florida’s two senators, Republican Marco Rubio and Democrat Bill Nelson. Florida is the home to NASA, and both Rubio and Nelson have complained that Bridenstine, a politician, lacks management experience.

jednak, some observers have speculated that Rubio’s opposition might have been partially motivated by Bridenstine’s support for Rubio’s primary opponent Ted Cruz in the 2016 GOP presidential campaign, which caused relations between the Oklahoman and the Floridian to become bitter.

The private space flight industry has largely welcomed the news of Bridenstine’s nomination. Commercial Spaceflight Federation (CSF), a private spaceflight advocacy group composed of space industry giants such as SpaceX and XCOR Aerospace, issued a statement praising President Trump’s nomination of Bridenstine.

“NASA needs dedicated and inspired leadership, and Representative Bridenstine is an outstanding choice to provide precisely that,” said S. Alan Stern, board chair of CSF.

Similarly, several space experts have voiced support for Bridenstine. „[Jim Bridenstine] understands space technology, economics and policy better than most of the people who advise our other policy makers on these topics,” said space researcher and educator Greg Autry. Previously Greg Autry had served as the Trump administration’s liaison to NASA. “Far from being a politician, Bridenstine is a well-informed aviator and leader,” Autry said.

Challenging China’s Presence in Space

Bridenstine has previously expressed serious concerns about China’s space ambitions, as he sees the U.S. presence in space and competition with other adversaries there as intimately linked with national security. Bridenstine’s support for a new manned mission to the Moon is partially motivated by China’s ever-expanding presence on and around the Moon.

In this July 20, 1969 file photo, astronaut Edwin E. “Buzz” Aldrin Jr. stands next to a U.S. flag planted on the moon during the Apollo 11 mission. Aldrin and Neil Armstrong were the first men to walk on the lunar surface. Jim Bridenstine, Trump’s newly nominated administrator of NASA, vows to compete with China in space by launching new manned mission to the Moon. (Neil A. Armstrong/NASA)

“As the cis-lunar economy develops, competition for locations and resources on the Moon is inevitable,” Jim Bridenstine wrote in a Blog post w 2016, “The Chinese currently have landers and rovers on the Moon. The United States does not.”

In another Blog post w 2015, Bridenstine wrote that: “We are seeing the Russians and Chinese attempt to deny space to us. The Russians are launching things into space that are not being registered with the agencies they would normally be registered with.”

“Space is no longer uncontested,” Bridenstine wrote. “It’s being contested, and it’s congested.”

If confirmed by the Senate, Bridenstine will head an agency that currently has an annual budget of more than $19 miliard. The current budget however takes up less than 0.5 percent of the total federal budget, a tiny portion compared to NASA’s heyday. During the 1960s the United States allocated almost 5 percent of the annual federal budget to NASA to fund the manned space missions to the Moon.

Przeczytaj cały artykuł tutaj

Senator Joel Anderson speaks in front of the California State Capitol in Sacramento during a rally to support a resolution condemning the Chinese Communist Party's persecution of Falun Gong practitioners, on Aug. 29, 2017. (Mark Cao/Epoch Times)Senator Joel Anderson speaks in front of the California State Capitol in Sacramento during a rally to support a resolution condemning the Chinese Communist Party's persecution of Falun Gong practitioners, on Aug. 29, 2017. (Mark Cao/Epoch Times)

SACRAMENTO, CA—Impassioned speeches asking Californians to stand together against tyranny were heard at the State Capitol on Aug. 31 when around 200 Human Rights activists gathered to show support for SJR 10—a resolution that condemns the Chinese Communist Party for its ongoing persecution of Falun Dafa practitioners.

State legislators as well as three survivors of the brutal persecution, implored Californians to stand together against the “egregious state-sponsored violence,” as one Senator put it, that is now occurring in China.

sie. 29, the resolution had passed the Judiciary Committee hearing unanimously. But then on Sept. 1, the day following the rally, the State Senate unexpectedly voted to refer SJR 10 back to the Rules Committee—essentially blocking it from coming to a vote in the Senate.

Foreign Interference

The action appears to be the direct result of interference by the Chinese communist regime in American governmental affairs.

That morning, the members of the Senate received by email an unsigned letter on the stationary of the Chinese Consulate in San Francisco.

“We would like to urgently draw the attention of the California legislature to SJR-10,” the letter begins. “This may deeply damage the cooperative relations between the state of California and China.”

Później, the letter points out the high level of trade China has with California, the great number of tourists from China who visit the state, and how China is the largest source of foreign students who attend California’s colleges and universities.

Then it directly asks legislators not to support the resolution, “so as not to sabotage the friendship and sustainable development between California and China.”

The author of the resolution, Senator Joel Anderson, knew that passing an official condemnation of China’s human rights abuses would not be easy.

At the rally Anderson said: “I proudly stand here with everyone to condemn the Chinese Government for their persecution of Falun Gong practitioners. … It takes great courage to stand up against persecution, to stand up against one of the greatest nations in the world—China—and to call them out for their practice of harvesting organs and the genocide they have created against Falun Gong. Together, we’ve taken our first steps towards defending freedom and human rights.”

Falun Dafa, znany również jako Falun Gong, is a traditional Chinese spiritual discipline that consists of performing gentle exercises and living by the principles of truthfulness, współczucie, i tolerancja. First brought to the public in 1992, it spread rapidly throughout China and by 1999 byli 70 milionów 100 million people practicing.

Fearing its popularity—there were more Falun Gong practitioners than members of the Communist Party—then Chinese leader Jiang Zemin banned the practice and enlisted the nation’s entire security complex, media, and judiciary to participate in a massive persecution campaign that continues today.

narząd zbioru

The persecution over 18 years has amounted to genocide. At the rally, Anderson used this weighty word and called for it to stop.

“In World War II, there were deniers who said the Holocaust didn’t exist, who said it wasn’t happening. We now know that the Holocaust happened and that millions of Jews lost their lives. I will not stand by and watch millions of Falun Gong practitioners lose their lives,” Anderson said.

“If you feel strongly and you believe that nobody should be persecuted or executed for their body parts because they practice a faith, then you need to call your legislator and tell them that they need to stop genocide in China," powiedział.

Anderson was referring to the murder of Falun Gong practitioners to supply China’s flourishing organ transplantation industry.

In July 2006, Canada’s former secretary of state (Asia/Pacific) David Kilgour and international human rights lawyer David Matas released a report, „Bloody Harvest,” which investigated allegations that Chinese state institutions were “harvesting organs from live Falun Gong practitioners, killing the practitioners in the process.”

Kilgour and Matas determined it was true.

Former Canadian Secretary of State for Asia-Pacific David Kilgour presents a revised report about continued murder of Falun Gong practitioners in China for their organs, as report co-author lawyer David Matas listens in the background, on Jan. 31, 2007. (The Epoch Times)

Former Canadian Secretary of State for Asia-Pacific David Kilgour presents a report about the murder of Falun Gong practitioners in China for their organs, as report co-author lawyer David Matas listens in the background, on Jan. 31, 2007. (The Epoch Times)

W 2016, Kilgour and Matas, joined by Ethan Gutmann (autor "The Slaughter: Mass Killings, narząd zbioru, and China’s Secret Solution to Its Dissident Problem” ) released an updated report.

The raport explains that it represents “a meticulous examination of the transplant programs of hundreds of hospitals in China, drawing on media reports, official propaganda, medical journals, hospital websites and a vast amount of deleted websites found in archive.”

The researchers analyzed hospital revenue, bed counts, bed utilization rates, surgical personnel, training programs, state funding and more, and concluded that China performs 60,000 do 100,000 transplants per year—not 10,000 as the regime claims.

The authors determined that most of the organs come from Falun Gong practitioners, with a lesser number from other prisoners of conscience drawn from Tibetans, Ujgurzy, Chrześcijanie i domu.

Call to Action

Rally at the California State Capitol in Sacramento support of resolution SJR 10, which condemns the Chinese Communist Party for its ongoing persecution of Falun Dafa practitioners, Aug. 31, 2017. (Mark Cao/Epoch Times)

The rally was part celebration that the resolution had passed out of the Judiciary Committee and part encouragement, to help whip up support for the resolution in Senate.

At the heart of Anderson’s resolution were three statements:

Resolved by the Senate and the Assembly of the State of California, jointly, That the Legislature expresses support for Falun Gong practitioners’ 18-year nonviolent resistance against persecution, which exemplifies uncompromising courage and human spirit; and be it further

Resolved, That the Legislature condemns any government-sanctioned persecution of Falun Gong practitioners in the People’s Republic of China or elsewhere; and be it further

Resolved, That the Legislature urges the President and the Congress of the United States to condemn any government-sanctioned persecution of Falun Gong practitioners in the People’s Republic of China or elsewhere;

Joining Senator Anderson in authoring SJR 10 are four State Assembly members—Democrats Adrin Nazarian and Cristina Garcia, and Republicans Randy Voepel and Tom Lackey—making the resolution a bipartisan effort.

Voepel also spoke at the rally, affirming the importance of the resolution and the message it sends to the Chinese regime.

“It makes the vital statement that we stand against oppression—against a regime that wants to control the minds and bodies of its own people,” Voepel said. “Organ harvesting is big money over there—it’s an underground economy.

“That is pure evil in the world, and I will stand up against evil in any way I can.”

Three Falun Gong practitioners who now live in California also spoke, sharing heartbreaking stories of being arrested, brainwashed, and brutally tortured simply because they would not give up their beliefs.

randyvoepel

Resolution co-author Assemblyman Randy Voepel speaks during a rally on Aug. 29, 2017 in Sacramento, in support of Falun Gong practitioners’ peaceful resistance in the face of persecution. (Mark Cao/Epoch Times)

They also described how while in labor camps, only Falun Gong prisoners were given regular blood tests and brief medical exams, which was odd since clearly the regime did not care for the health of prisoners it was torturing. They believed these tests were for the purpose of establishing a living organ bank. One medical researcher compared detained practitioners to lobsters in the tank in a seafood restaurant, ready to be plucked out whenever needed.

David Xu was a financial software engineer in China. His good friend was tortured to death while imprisoned in 2011. W kwietniu 2016, Xu feared it was his turn.

Kidnapped from his home, he was taken to a brainwashing center where he endured extreme torture. The most frightening moments for him were when his blood was taken. He was well aware of the regime’s practice of harvesting the organs of Falun Gong practitioners and was terrified for his life. He went on a hunger strike for 18 days before he was released.

Safe in America, he can’t stop worrying about his friends and family back in China. “Even though I escaped, It is hard for me to find peace in my heart because there are still so many Falun Gong practitioners in prison there.”

His story is echoed by Jie Li and Yolanda Yao. Speaking to the crowd, they both shared chilling stories of imprisonment, torture, and mysterious blood tests. They saw fellow practitioners beaten mercilessly, and then saw them disappear.

Yolanda Yao, now a resident of Sunnyvale, had to give up her PhD studies because of the persecution. She was arrested in 2011 and spent two years imprisoned. “Words cannot describe the pain I have felt. I experienced firsthand the brutality of the persecution of Falun Gong practitioners. Those were the darkest moments of my life.”

Imprisoned in the Beijing Women’s Labor Camp, she spoke of being subjected to around-the-clock brainwashing sessions and unrelenting mental and physical torture. Forced to sit in a child’s chair for 10 do 11 hours every day, her legs and feet would swell immensely, resulting in severe bruising and ulceration in her back and hips.

She was also forced to perform to slave labor in summer temperatures surpassing 100 degrees, and was once soaked in pesticide when the 70-pound barrel she was carrying on her back leaked all over her.

The most horrific thing she experienced, jednak, were the blood tests she and fellow Falun Gong practitioners were given three times a year. Like Xu, she was aware of the forced organ harvesting, and was certain that their blood was being tested to evaluate them as potential candidates.

Although she is safe in California, her heart is still in China with her elderly parents who are both imprisoned for their beliefs. “The suffering and torment I experienced in the labor camp still haunts me to this day. It horrifies me to know that my parents are suffering the same fate.”

Her only solace is the hope that through international pressure and individual actions they will be released. She ended her speech with a plea:

“I humbly ask for your help in raising public awareness of this brutal persecution and hope that together we can bring an end to 18 years of harassment, torture, killing, and most heinous of all, forced organ harvesting of Falun Gong practitioners.”

State Assembly Member Tom Lackey shares his hope that the people of California will stand together and oppose these crimes. “That you have a government that would actually approve such a hurtful and wicked practice is just unimaginable. These people have no control—those of us who do need to speak very loudly so we can influence the government and pressure them to change this policy so that lives can be saved.”

Additional reporting by Stephen Gregory

Przeczytaj cały artykuł tutaj

New Balance shoes at the New York Fashion Week on July 16, 2015. (Kena Betancur/AFP/Getty Images)New Balance shoes at the New York Fashion Week on July 16, 2015. (Kena Betancur/AFP/Getty Images)

A Chinese court recently awarded New Balance over 10 mln juanów ($1.5 milion) for trademark infringement, one of the highest compensations for such a violation granted to foreign companies.

The Intermediate People’s Court of Suzhou, a major coastal city in southeastern Jiangsu Province, ruled the three defendants—Zheng Chaosong, Xinpingheng (a Chinese translation of New Balance) Sporting Goods, and Bosidake Trading company—violated New Balance’s trademark by copying its iconic sloping “N” logo.

The court said the trio that made shoes under the brand New Boom had shown a “malice by free-riding,” which led to “confusion by a large number of consumers,” according to a copy of the ruling obtained by The New York Times. The ruling has not been made public at press time.

The ruling came just three days after President Trump initiated a probe into China’s alleged intellectual property theft. The IP Commission Report estimates that Chinese counterfeit goods cost the U.S. $600 billion annually.

New Balance might also have benefited from China’s new trademark law implemented on May 1, 2014, which increased the upper limit of trademark infringement awards from $75,000 do $450,000.

New Balance’s battle for protecting its trademark rights in China has been a lengthy and difficult one.

Founded in 1906 in Boston, a city known for one of the world’s oldest annual marathon events, New Balance is one of the top foot gear manufacturers.

New Balance made its first entry into Chinese markets in 1995 under the transliteration Niu Balun, and has since fought with several Chinese manufacturers and a shoe supplier that exploited its brand by selling its shoes at dirt cheap prices.

Unlike many Western countries, China awards trademarks by the order companies file them. W 2012, Apple was made to pay $60 million to a local competitor that registered the trademark iPad.

W 2013, New Balance lost its dispute with Chinese shoemaker Xin Bailun, which claimed to have registered in June, 2004, two years before New Balance started promoting the same brand name. New Balance appealed, and lost again in June 2016, and was ordered to pay the Chinese company 5 mln juanów (na około $750,000).

The recent court ruling marked an unprecedented victory for New Balance and other western brands that tried to compete with their Chinese rivals in a market troubled with piracy and inadequate brand protection.

Ostatni rok, the legendary basketball star Michael Jordan prevailed in a 5-year dispute over a local sportswear company that used his name. Under Armour, W międzyczasie, won a $15 million lawsuit this past June against Chinese company Uncle Martin, which directly copied its logo and sneaker design.

“For every big brand that is infringed in China, there are many, many less famous brands that are victims of this situation,” Paolo Beconcini, an experienced consultant on Chinese intellectual property cases at law firm Squire Patton, told BBC in an interview.

“It sends a strong and powerful message that should make it easier for foreign brands doing business here,” Carol Wang, a lawyer at Lusheng Law Firm told Reuters on behalf of New Balance.

Chiny, the second largest market for sports gear, has seen a growing interest in jogging and fitness activities. New Balance occupied about 1.8 percent of Chinese shoe market in 2016, as compared to 7 percent for Adidas and 7.8 percent for Nike, according to Euromonitor.

Przeczytaj cały artykuł tutaj
  • tagi:,
  • Autor: <a href="http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/author/eva-fu/" rel="author">Eva Fu</za>, <a href="http://www.theepochtimes.com/" title="Epoch Times" rel="publisher">Epoch Times</za>
  • Kategoria: Generał

The Qiaodan brand logo is displayed at a Qiaodan store in Hangzhou in China's Zhejiang province on December 8, 2016.(STR / AFP / Getty Images)The Qiaodan brand logo is displayed at a Qiaodan store in Hangzhou in China's Zhejiang province on December 8, 2016.(STR / AFP / Getty Images)

Basketball icon Michael Jordan’s legal battle with Chinese sporting goods brand Qiaodan Sports Company looks to be far from over even after winning a lawsuit against them late last year.

That lawsuit, decided by China’s highest court after several lower courts ruled against Jordan, established Jordan’s ownership of the legal rights to the Chinese transliteration of his name.

In July, jednak, Qiaodan filed a lawsuit against Jordan and Fangda Partners, the law firm representing him in China, claiming an infringement of reputation. Według China News Service, the company is demanding compensation of 1.1 mln juanów ($160 thousand) for the “malicious slander” and damage to its reputation caused by a letter sent by Fangda to the organizers of the 13th National Games of China. Qiaodan claimed that the letter had twisted content from the Supreme People’s Court’s (SPC) decision in an attempt to stop the organizers from working with the sportswear company.

Qiaodan also demanded a retraction of the letter along with a public apology.

Qiaodan’s lawyer, Chen Ruojian, said that the company “has had to undertake much effort to maintain its business relationship with its partners after Jordan and his lawyers made this attack.”

Jordan maintained in the previous lawsuit, which lasted four years, that the use of his name was misleading Chinese consumers into believing that he was affiliated with the brand.

In a statement released after the December ruling, powiedział, „Chinese consumers deserve to know that Qiaodan Sports and its products have no connection to me.”

The ruling by the SPC was one rarely seen in a legal system infamous for favoring Chinese companies in intellectual property rights cases involving foreign companies. W maju 2016, Apple lost a trademark case against a Chinese leather goods company that uses the iPhone name for its products. Footwear company New Balance was forced to pay $16 million after a court ruled that they had violated the trademark rights of a Chinese individual who owned the Chinese version of the company’s name. Other Western companies and celebrities such as Starbucks, Tesla, and U.S. President Donald Trump have also encountered legal battles in the past over the right to use their name in China.

Przeczytaj cały artykuł tutaj

Hundreds of Falun Gong practitioners hold a candlelight vigil at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington on July 20, 2017, to honor those who have died during the persecution in China that the Chinese regime started on July 20, 1999. (Benjamin Chasteen / The Epoch Times)Hundreds of Falun Gong practitioners hold a candlelight vigil at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington on July 20, 2017, to honor those who have died during the persecution in China that the Chinese regime started on July 20, 1999. (Benjamin Chasteen / The Epoch Times)

WASHINGTON—Numerous candlelights flickered in the darkness as hundreds of Falun Dafa practitioners held a vigil in front of the Lincoln Memorial to remember the victims of the Chinese communist regime’s persecution of the practice.

The traditional Chinese spiritual discipline of Falun Dafa, znany również jako Falun Gong, was first introduced in China in 1992. Many Chinese were attracted to the practice for its physical benefits and moral philosophy rooted in the principles of truthfulness, współczucie, i tolerancja. It has been persecuted since July 1999 after it became too popular in the eyes of a former communist leader, who ordered it to be eliminated.

A woman joins Falun Gong practitioners hold a candlelight vigil at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington on July 20, 2017, to honor those who have died during the persecution in China that the Chinese regime started on July 20, 1999. (Benjamin Chasteen / The Epoch Times)

A woman joins Falun Gong practitioners in a candlelight vigil at Lincoln Memorial in Washington on July 20, 2017, to honor the lives lost since the Chinese regime launched the persecution eighteen years ago. (Benjamin Chasteen / The Epoch Times)

Since then, hundreds of thousands of practitioners have been thrown into prisons, labor camps, and brainwashing centers where they are coerced through physical and psychological torture into renouncing their beliefs. A large but indefinite number of Falun Gong practitioners have also been killed for their organs to fuel China’s lucrative transplant industry, według raporty.

Falun Dafa practitioners gathered in Washington D.C. on July 20 for a series of events, including a rally, parade, and a candlelight vigil, to honor the lives lost over the past eighteen years.

Pooja Mor joins Falun Gong practitioners during a candlelight vigil around the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool in Washington on July 20, 2017, to honor those who have died during the persecution in China that the Chinese regime started on July 20, 1999. (Benjamin Chasteen / The Epoch Times)

Pooja Mor, a fashion model, joins Falun Gong practitioners during a candlelight vigil around the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool in Washington on July 20, 2017, to honor the lives lost since the Chinese regime launched the persecution eighteen years ago. (Benjamin Chasteen / The Epoch Times)

Pooja Mor, a 25-year-old Indian fashion model, joined in the day’s events in DC to show her support. Mor started practicing Falun Dafa two and a half years ago after her agent in India introduced it to her.

“Before I used to blame people for everything wrong that happened in my life. After learning Falun Dafa, I started to look within,” Mor said. “Instead of finding faults with others, I first look to see where I’m lacking.”

Falun Dafa practitioner Yang Guangyu, a native of Beijing who came to the US in 2009, powiedziany, “Falun Dafa practitioners simply want to cultivate themselves, to promote moral values, and to improve their health.” Yang was detained in late 2001 in a prison and later a forced labor camp for peacefully defending Falun Dafa in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square, a popular site of protest in China.

Many tourists and visitors who passed by the candlelight vigil expressed their sympathy and shock at the human rights abuses occurring in China.

“I have trouble understanding why something like this would be persecuted in China,” said Catherine Ramos, a tourist from New Jersey.

Lynne DePalma, who was with Ramos, powiedziany, “It’s a communist country, so it’s a closed society. And a lot of things that go on, the world doesn’t know about unless people do something like this and bring it to the world’s attention.”

“It’s an atrocity, and it shouldn’t be happening,” DePalma added. “It’s immoral. It’s abusive.”

Ma Cunxia, a Falun Gong practitioner from Changchun City in northeastern China, called on the U.S. government to take a firmer stance. “I hope the government, particularly the Trump administration, can act on America’s founding values of human rights and freedom of belief and call for an end to this 18-year-long persecution.”

Eva Fu contributed to this report.

Hundreds of Falun Gong practitioners hold a candlelight vigil at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington on July 20, 2017, to honor those who have died during the persecution in China that the Chinese regime started on July 20, 1999. (Benjamin Chasteen / The Epoch Times)

Falun Gong practitioners hold a candlelight vigil at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington on July 20, 2017, to honor the lives lost since the Chinese regime launched the persecution eighteen years ago. (Benjamin Chasteen / The Epoch Times)

A woman joins Falun Gong practitioners hold a candlelight vigil at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington on July 20, 2017, to honor those who have died during the persecution in China that the Chinese regime started on July 20, 1999. (Benjamin Chasteen / The Epoch Times)

A woman joins Falun Gong practitioners at a candlelight vigil at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington on July 20, 2017, to honor the lives lost since the Chinese regime launched the persecution eighteen years ago. (Benjamin Chasteen / The Epoch Times)

Hundreds of Falun Gong practitioners hold a candlelight vigil at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington on July 20, 2017, to honor those who have died during the persecution in China that the Chinese regime started on July 20, 1999. (Benjamin Chasteen / The Epoch Times)

Falun Gong practitioners hold a candlelight vigil at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington on July 20, 2017, to honor the lives lost since the Chinese regime launched the persecution eighteen years ago. (Benjamin Chasteen / The Epoch Times)

A woman joins Falun Gong practitioners hold a candlelight vigil at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington on July 20, 2017, to honor those who have died during the persecution in China that the Chinese regime started on July 20, 1999. (Benjamin Chasteen / The Epoch Times)

A woman joins Falun Gong practitioners at a candlelight vigil at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington on July 20, 2017, to honor the lives lost since the Chinese regime launched the persecution eighteen years ago. (Benjamin Chasteen / The Epoch Times)

Hundreds of Falun Gong practitioners hold a candlelight vigil at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington on July 20, 2017, to honor those who have died during the persecution in China that the Chinese regime started on July 20, 1999. (Benjamin Chasteen / The Epoch Times)

Falun Gong practitioners hold a candlelight vigil at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington on July 20, 2017, to honor the lives lost since the Chinese regime launched the persecution eighteen years ago. (Benjamin Chasteen / The Epoch Times)

A little boy joins Falun Gong practitioners hold a candlelight vigil at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington on July 20, 2017, to honor those who have died during the persecution in China that the Chinese regime started on July 20, 1999. (Benjamin Chasteen / The Epoch Times)

A little boy joins Falun Gong practitioners at a candlelight vigil at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington on July 20, 2017, to honor the lives lost since the Chinese regime launched the persecution eighteen years ago. (Benjamin Chasteen / The Epoch Times)

Hundreds of Falun Gong practitioners hold a candlelight vigil at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington on July 20, 2017, to honor those who have died during the persecution in China that the Chinese regime started on July 20, 1999. (Benjamin Chasteen / The Epoch Times)

Falun Gong practitioners hold a candlelight vigil at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington on July 20, 2017, to honor the lives lost since the Chinese regime launched the persecution eighteen years ago. (Benjamin Chasteen / The Epoch Times)

A woman joins Falun Gong practitioners hold a candlelight vigil at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington on July 20, 2017, to honor those who have died during the persecution in China that the Chinese regime started on July 20, 1999. (Benjamin Chasteen / The Epoch Times)

A woman joins Falun Gong practitioners at a candlelight vigil at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington on July 20, 2017, to honor the lives lost since the Chinese regime launched the persecution eighteen years ago. (Benjamin Chasteen / The Epoch Times)

Hundreds of Falun Gong practitioners hold a candlelight vigil at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington on July 20, 2017, to honor those who have died during the persecution in China that the Chinese regime started on July 20, 1999. (Benjamin Chasteen / The Epoch Times)

Falun Gong practitioners hold a candlelight vigil at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington on July 20, 2017, to honor the lives lost since the Chinese regime launched the persecution eighteen years ago. (Benjamin Chasteen / The Epoch Times)

A woman joins Falun Gong practitioners hold a candlelight vigil at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington on July 20, 2017, to honor those who have died during the persecution in China that the Chinese regime started on July 20, 1999. (Benjamin Chasteen / The Epoch Times)

A woman joins Falun Gong practitioners at a candlelight vigil at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington on July 20, 2017, to honor the lives lost since the Chinese regime launched the persecution eighteen years ago. (Benjamin Chasteen / The Epoch Times)

Przeczytaj cały artykuł tutaj

Hundreds of Falun Gong practitioners march in a parade in Washington D.C. on July 20, 2017. The parade is calling for an end to a brutal persecution in China that started on July 20, 1999. (Larry Dye / The Epoch Times)Hundreds of Falun Gong practitioners march in a parade in Washington D.C. on July 20, 2017. The parade is calling for an end to a brutal persecution in China that started on July 20, 1999. (Larry Dye / The Epoch Times)

WASHINGTON—In the early afternoon of July 20, koniec 1,000 practitioners and supporters of the Falun Gong spiritual discipline held a parade to protest 18 years of deadly repression by the communist regime in China. The parade goers, mostly wearing Falun Gong’s signature yellow T-shirts, marched from Capitol Hill through downtown Washington, D.C.. to the Lincoln Memorial.

This year’s events also included a rally at Capitol Hill and a candlelight vigil before the Washington Monument.

Falun Gong, a spiritual practice that teaches a set of meditation exercises and cultivation of the principles of truthfulness, współczucie, i tolerancja, was marked for persecution on July 20, 1999, by then-Chinese Communist Party leader Jiang Zemin. Since then, the Chinese authorities have pursued a violent campaign of elimination against the practice.

“The Chinese regime’s persecution has been completely irrational and violent. We petition peacefully. We carry no weapons. We have only kind intentions. But what we face are police, police cars, armed police. The armed police face you as if you are a terrible enemy,” said Liu Zhaohe, a 64-year-old philosophy professor who came from Beijing to the United States this March.

 Liu Zhaohe, a former philosophy professor, and his wife Wang Lurui participate in a Falun Gong parade in Washington D.C on July 20, 2017. (Irene Luo/Epoch Times)

Liu Zhaohe, a former philosophy professor, and his wife Wang Lurui participate in a Falun Gong parade in Washington D.C on July 20, 2017. (Irene Luo/The Epoch Times)

His wife, 60-year-old Wang Lurui, was arrested 11 times while putting up Falun Gong banners and meditating in public, including several occasions when she went to Tiananmen Square. She was also fired from her position as a hospital administrator in Beijing.

“Since coming here, we continue to nonviolently, rationally oppose the persecution so everyone knows that Falun Dafa is good and that truthfulness, współczucie, and tolerance are universal moral principles,” Wang said.

Millions of Falun Gong adherents in China and abroad have used a variety of peaceful means to raise awareness about and counteract the persecution, sometimes at great personal risk. Human rights researchers estimate that Chinese authorities have detained millions of practitioners, and that hundreds of thousands are held in forced labor camps and brainwashing centers.

Od 2006, investigations have revealed that a large but yet indeterminate number of Falun Gong adherents have been executed and had their organs harvested in state and military-run hospitals across China.

Li Jianying, a middle-aged woman from Taiyuan, Shanxi Province, was driven to escape China in 2015 when someone reported her practice of Falun Gong to the police. She now lives in Middletown, upstate New York, and raises awareness about Falun Gong in the community as a volunteer. Her 79-year-old mother, also a practitioner, is still in China.

“I want to see her again, but I can’t go back,„Li mówi. “You go back and they arrest you at the airport.”

Each year, Falun Gong practitioners in the U.S. and around the world hold commemorative events to mark the anniversary of the persecution.

During the parade, practitioners carried banners calling for the end of the persecution and live organ harvesting and for Jiang Zemin to be brought to justice. A military-style marching band composed of Falun Gong practitioners joined in. Other marchers held photos of those who had been killed in the persecution.

Passers-by were shocked to learn of the violence against the group.

Wilna LaPorte, who works in a Washington, D.C.. public defense service, was drawn to the serene, traditional Chinese music.

Wilna LaPorte. (Eva Fu/The Epoch Times)

Wilna LaPorte. (Eva Fu/The Epoch Times)

“I can’t believe this is going on,” she said between tears after hearing about China’s organ transplantation industry, which has heavily targeted Falun Gong practitioners. “I don’t see why human lives should be commercialized when there are so much that has already been commercialized from China.”

“People need to be made aware of what’s happening in different countries, not only here,” said Cynthia Simms, who works as an educational administrator.

“A lot of times, we don’t know what other people go through and what they have to deal with on a day to day basis.”

Liu Zhaohe, the former professor from Beijing, said that the Chinese authorities “persecute all independent thoughts, independent beliefs.”

He added: “There’s no freedom of belief, wolność słowa. This is the most immoral thing done by the Chinese regime. They don’t just destroy you physically, but also destroy you mentally, force you to ‘transform.’ They stifle your thoughts so you do not have your own thoughts.”

With reporting by Eva Fu and Irene Luo.

Hundreds of Falun Gong practitioners march in a parade in Washington D.C. on July 20, 2017. The parade is calling for an end to a brutal persecution in China that started on July 20, 1999. (Benjamin Chasteen / The Epoch Times)

Hundreds of Falun Gong practitioners march in a parade in Washington D.C. on July 20, 2017. The parade is calling for an end to a brutal persecution in China that started on July 20, 1999. (Benjamin Chasteen / The Epoch Times)

Hundreds of Falun Gong practitioners march in a parade in Washington D.C. on July 20, 2017. The parade is calling for an end to a brutal persecution in China that started on July 20, 1999. (Larry Dye / The Epoch Times)

Hundreds of Falun Gong practitioners march in a parade in Washington D.C. on July 20, 2017. The parade is calling for an end to a brutal persecution in China that started on July 20, 1999. (Larry Dye / The Epoch Times)

Hundreds of Falun Gong practitioners march in a parade in Washington D.C. on July 20, 2017. The parade is calling for an end to a brutal persecution in China that started on July 20, 1999. (Benjamin Chasteen / The Epoch Times)

Hundreds of Falun Gong practitioners march in a parade in Washington D.C. on July 20, 2017. The parade is calling for an end to a brutal persecution in China that started on July 20, 1999. (Benjamin Chasteen / The Epoch Times)

Hundreds of Falun Gong practitioners march in a parade in Washington D.C. on July 20, 2017. The parade is calling for an end to a brutal persecution in China that started on July 20, 1999. (Larry Dye / The Epoch Times)

Hundreds of Falun Gong practitioners march in a parade in Washington D.C. on July 20, 2017. The parade is calling for an end to a brutal persecution in China that started on July 20, 1999. (Larry Dye / The Epoch Times)

Hundreds of Falun Gong practitioners march in a parade in Washington D.C. on July 20, 2017. The parade is calling for an end to a brutal persecution in China that started on July 20, 1999. (Benjamin Chasteen / The Epoch Times)

Hundreds of Falun Gong practitioners march in a parade in Washington D.C. on July 20, 2017. The parade is calling for an end to a brutal persecution in China that started on July 20, 1999. (Benjamin Chasteen / The Epoch Times)

Hundreds of Falun Gong practitioners march in a parade in Washington D.C. on July 20, 2017. The parade is calling for an end to a brutal persecution in China that started on July 20, 1999. (Benjamin Chasteen / The Epoch Times)

Hundreds of Falun Gong practitioners march in a parade in Washington D.C. on July 20, 2017. The parade is calling for an end to a brutal persecution in China that started on July 20, 1999. (Benjamin Chasteen / The Epoch Times)

Hundreds of Falun Gong practitioners march in a parade in Washington D.C. on July 20, 2017. The parade is calling for an end to a brutal persecution in China that started on July 20, 1999. (Benjamin Chasteen / The Epoch Times)

Hundreds of Falun Gong practitioners march in a parade in Washington D.C. on July 20, 2017. The parade is calling for an end to a brutal persecution in China that started on July 20, 1999. (Benjamin Chasteen / The Epoch Times)

Przeczytaj cały artykuł tutaj

The Tianlangxing, a Chinese People’s Liberation Army-Navy Type 815 Dongdiao-class auxiliary general intelligence ship, passed through the Tsugaru Strait off the coast of Japan on July 2, and stayed off the Alaskan coast during the July 11th test of a U.S. missile defence system. (Courtesy Japanese Ministry of Defence)The Tianlangxing, a Chinese People’s Liberation Army-Navy Type 815 Dongdiao-class auxiliary general intelligence ship, passed through the Tsugaru Strait off the coast of Japan on July 2, and stayed off the Alaskan coast during the July 11th test of a U.S. missile defence system. (Courtesy Japanese Ministry of Defence)

The Chinese spy ship that sailed international waters off the coast of Alaska during a recent missile defense test was a class that had never been seen before in Northern Command’s area-of-responsibility, a spokesperson said Friday.

It was the first Chinese military vessel in the area since 2015 when a Chinese “surface action group” transited through, said Michael Kucharek, a spokesperson for North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) and U.S. Northern Command.

Kucharek would not speculate as to what the ship was doing in the area, but mentioned several times that it was in international waters where it had the right of free navigation.

A military source familiar with the incident told The Epoch Times it was the same ship as reported by the Diplomat on July 4th, a Chinese People’s Liberation Army-Navy Type 815 Dongdiao-class auxiliary general intelligence (AGI) vessel.

Chinese state-owned media, the English language China Daily, reported on the ship in January in an article based on a report from a People’s Liberation Army (PLA) news outlet. The report focused on a newly commissioned ship, the Kaiyangxing.

The ship that was present for the missile test was the Tianlangxing, which passed through the Tsugaru Strait off the coast of Japan on July 2, according to the Japanese Ministry of Defense.

According to the PLA report cited by the China Daily, the PLA Navy now operates six electronic reconnaissance vessels. The report also gave specific information about the ships such as their capabilities and functions.

“Until now, the PLA Navy has never made public so many details about its intelligence collection ships,” said the report.

The newly launched Kaiyangxing was capable of conducting all-weather, round-the-clock reconnaissance on multiple and different targets,” the China Daily reported.

“The ship is so sophisticated that only a few countries, such as the United States and Russia, are capable of developing it,” it continued.

The China Daily quoted an unnamed source in the shipbuilding industry saying that the United States had 15 such ships.

The Tianlangxing arrived off the coast of Alaska shortly before the July 11 test of the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) system against an intermediate-range ballistic missile.

A spokesperson for the Missile Defense Agency told The Epoch Times it was the fastest target the system has been tested against so far.

The ship stayed approximately 100 miles off the Alaskan coast.

The THAAD system is designed to protect against intermediate- and short-range ballistic missiles, like those North Korea has amassed and threatened to launch against Japan and South Korea.

China is North Korea’s closest ally and major trading partner, accounting for 75 percent of North Korea’s imports and exports.

China’s ruling Communist Party, which has a faction that is close to the North Korean regime, has denounced the THAAD system that is now partially deployed in South Korea.

Speaking at an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council on July 5, the day after North Korea successfully tested an intercontinental ballistic missile that experts say could reach Alaska, representatives of China and Russia both called for the system to be dismantled.

Przeczytaj cały artykuł tutaj

A Chinese policeman asks not to take pictures outside Zhongnanhai which serves as the central headquarters for the Communist Party of China after the sacking of politician Bo Xilai from the countries powerful Politburo, in Beijing on April 11, 2012. (MARK RALSTON/AFP/Getty Images)A Chinese policeman asks not to take pictures outside Zhongnanhai which serves as the central headquarters for the Communist Party of China after the sacking of politician Bo Xilai from the countries powerful Politburo, in Beijing on April 11, 2012. (MARK RALSTON/AFP/Getty Images)

Despite the Chinese regime’s constant fear that U.S. policy makers have long been plotting a U.S.-led “regime change” in China, a senior former official under the Obama administration said there was never any such plan nor even any discussion remotely associated with the idea. This revelation sheds further light on the paranoid nature of the Chinese regime, but likely also raises questions concerning the Obama administration’s commitment to promoting such U.S. principles such as democracy and freedom in the world’s largest authoritarian nation.

Evan Medeiros, who served six years from 2009 do 2015 in the Obama administration as a senior China specialist, attended a Thursday panel at the Center for Strategic & International Studies to discuss his thoughts on the latest U.S.-China Relations reports published by American and Chinese think tanks and scholars.

Medeiros said that the fear of a U.S.-orchestrated “regime change” has been one of the most defining features of the Chinese regime’s perceptions toward the United States for decades, and that such fear still dominates the Chinese regime’s thinking about U.S.-China relations even today. Speaking on the basis of his six years of experience steering U.S.-China policy for Obama’s White House, jednak, Medeiros attested that there was never any discussion among Obama and senior officials concerning the possibility of regime change in China.

According to Medeiros, there was “not a single conversation” in which neither President Obama, nor Vice President Biden, nor the national security advisor raised any issue concerning China’s political system and its potential threat to American national security. Behind the curtain, the Obama administration never contemplated let alone attempted a change to the authoritarian rule of the Chinese regime. “Not even once, not even remotely close,” said Medeiros.

President Barack Obama speaks during a bilateral meeting with Chinese leader Xi Jinping at the Annenberg Retreat at Sunnylands in Rancho Mirage, Calif., w czerwcu 7, 2013. (JEWEL SAMAD/AFP/Getty Images)

President Barack Obama speaks during a bilateral meeting with Chinese leader Xi Jinping at the Annenberg Retreat at Sunnylands in Rancho Mirage, Calif., w czerwcu 7, 2013. (JEWEL SAMAD/AFP/Getty Images)

Evan Medeiros was regarded by many as being among the most pro-China policymakers in the White House during the Obama administration. According to Bill Gertz, a conservative critic of the Obama administration’s China policy, Evan Medeiros had written in academic writings before his White House posting that the Chinese military posed little or no threat to the interests of the United States, and that Beijing’s policies are generally benign.

Medeiros’s remark on Thursday likely provides additional evidence to support the long-held criticism among conservatives and many rights activists that the Obama administration did not do enough to influence the Chinese regime nor to assert fundamental U.S. principles such as democracy and freedom.

The Obama administration’s belief that China’s authoritarian regime poses no threat to American national security has been hotly contested by many others. Peter Navarro, a former professor in economics who now serves as President Trump’s director of the National Trade Council is known for his view that China’s Communist Party regime and its expansionist foreign policies pose direct threats to U.S. national interests and national security.

Although the Obama administration showed no interest in changing China’s political system, Evan Medeiros insisted that it still paid attention to “questions and concerns about human rights in China, [the regime’s] crackdown on political freedom.”

Just last week, the Congressional-Executive Commission on China (CECC) held a public hearing on China’s human rights abuses, in which Congressman Chris Smith, who is also the chairman of the CECC, criticized the Obama administration’s lack of effort in promoting human rights issues in China and slammed Obama’s China policy as “eight years of retreat.” The Congressionally-mandated CECC had been “pleading” with the Obama administration to take firm action on China’s human rights abuses to no avail, said Chris Smith.

Przeczytaj cały artykuł tutaj

The homepage of the Chinese edition of The Epoch Times on July 6. (Screenshot/The Epoch Times)The homepage of the Chinese edition of The Epoch Times on July 6. (Screenshot/The Epoch Times)

New research suggests that a series of large-scale cyberattacks on The Epoch Times, starting in January and continuing to the present, are part of a coordinated campaign.

CitizenLab of the University of Toronto published a raport on July 5, which detailed the cyberattacks and noted that several Chinese-language news outlets were targeted at the same time, apparently by the same group of hackers, and using the same methodologies.

The Epoch Times runs the largest Chinese-language news outlet not under the control of the Chinese Communist Party, and frequently publishes stories on topics forbidden in China such as the persecution of Falun Gong. The Epoch Times is part of Epoch Media Group, and its sister media, New Tang Dynasty Television (NTD), was also hit with cyberattacks at the same time.

The hackers took several steps in their attempts to breach and disable the targeted websites. They created mirror images of the official websites, with Internet URLs that were only slightly different from the originals. If someone were to misspell the intended website address, they could instead be directed to the fake site, which would then ask for the user’s login credentials—information the hackers were trying to steal.

At the same time, the hackers launched a series of large-scale distributed denial of service (DDoS) cyberattacks against the main websites, which attempted to overload the websites and force them offline. It also included more personal attacks that attempted to compromise computers and social media accounts of individual reporters.

Ronald Deibert, director of The Citizen Lab, wrote in a blog post that while all of the targets were “news websites that publish content critical of the Chinese government,” it is also difficult to attribute the attack to an official state agency. Deibert noted “It is possible the operators behind this campaign are ‘hackers for hire’—typical of the way in which a lot of cyber espionage is outsourced in China.”

The Epoch Times is targeted frequently by the Chinese regime, and methods have included cyberattacks, physical attacks, and threats. Several of the past attacks have been attributed by The Epoch Times to organs of the Chinese Communist Party.

W marcu, when the cyberattacks were increasing in strength and frequency, Stephen Gregory, publisher of the English-language edition of The Epoch Times, noted they “started just when The Epoch Times began publishing a new series on the Communist Party.”

Przeczytaj cały artykuł tutaj
  • tagi:, ,
  • Autor: <a href="http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/author/joshua-philipp/" rel="author">Joshua Philipp</za>, <a href="http://www.theepochtimes.com/" title="Epoch Times" rel="publisher">Epoch Times</za>
  • Kategoria: Generał

**

Terms commonly used during the Cold War have again emerged amid allegations that Russia tried to interfere with the 2016 NAS. elections. These words and phrases, which were all but forgotten in recent history, include “active measures,” “agents of influence,” and “disinformation,” and they are tied to campaigns meant to alter public perception and influence political decision-making.

While it has been a struggle to prove that Russia’s alleged campaign to influence the U.S. presidential election had any effect, these strategies of influence are in fact being used heavily against the United States—only now, most are carried out not by Russia, but by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

All of these systems fall under an umbrella strategy known as “political warfare,” and the Chinese regime has at least an entire military branch and two political branches, as well as large-scale systems for information control, to carry out its aims on a massive scale.

“We haven’t even begun to coordinate ourselves to take on this challenge,” said Richard Fisher, senior fellow on Asian military affairs with the International Assessment and Strategy Center.

“Any political activity undertaken by a dictatorship that, at its core, is devoted to the destruction of freedom, warrants the broad attention of Western security organs," powiedział.

Political warfare is a unique system of fighting that targets many things we would not normally think of as military targets, using systems most of us would not regard as weapons.

“Political warfare seeks to influence emotions, motives, objective reasoning, and behavior of foreign governments, organizations, groups, and individuals in a manner favorable to one’s own political-military objectives,” states a 2013 raport on the CCP’s political warfare operations from politics and security think tank Project 2049 Institute.

This form of warfare can include any number of methods that can alter public opinion or political policy. It can take the form of an agent of influence laughing and shaking hands in political or business circles; beautiful female spies being sent to date or marry foreign policymakers and thought leaders; financial deals allowing agents to exert influence over a targeted industry; or professors and think tank employees getting friendly invites to speak in China, where they are wooed into thinking the world is wrong about the CCP.

Even civilian populations are targeted. Campaigns include paying for CCP propaganda to run in foreign news outlets, such as the “China Watch” inserts published by American newspapers including The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post.

Through these means, the CCP’s political warfare systems aim to alter foreign views on its policies, lay down new interpretations of its authoritarian rule, or influence foreign policy to advance its interests.

“In an orchestrated campaign of good cop/bad cop, Chinese officials have gone directly to U.S. public opinion, trying to appeal to sentimental feelings of cooperation and partnership while literally threatening war,” states the Project 2049 raport, quoting a report from J. Michael Waller of the Institute of World Politics.

“The operation is aimed at five levels: the American public at large, journalists who influence the public and decision-makers, business elites, Congress, and the president and his inner circle,” it states.

An Unseen War

The CCP has several departments heavily focused on political warfare. These include its military’s General Political Department, as well as its Propaganda Department, United Front Department, and Overseas Chinese Affairs Office.

According to Fisher, jednak, its operations are not limited to just these departments, and “there could be extensive overlap between them—this is not uncommon in Chinese active measure endeavors.”

“In China, intelligence is stratified,” Fisher said. The regime’s intelligence departments at nearly any level, in any city, “can be approved to run independent and international operations.”

He also noted that there is a formlessness to political warfare operations—the focus is the goal, not the method.

“In no given order of priority, they could include compromising a political target, enlisting a political target, and defaming, damaging the reputation of a political target. It could also include short-term or sophisticated long-term propaganda, or directed information campaigns," powiedział, adding that among many other things, political warfare includes altering information or manufacturing false information.

Political warfare has different names under different regimes. The Chinese regime’s lexicon refers to it as “liaison work,” according to Project 2049, while the Soviet Union referred to it as “active measures.”

It also overlaps with many other forms of unconventional warfare. Among its main components is psychological warfare, used to impact an opponent’s will to fight, or to change its interpretation of events. An example would be Soviet propaganda that fed popular opinion in the United States with the aim of ending the Vietnam War.

Psychological warfare under the CCP’s military “is the employment of psychology, through such means as propaganda, to sap the will of an opponent’s military and civilian populace, as well as to counter an opponent’s effort to do the same,” states Dean Cheng, in a 2012 raport in Special Warfare, Stany Zjednoczone. Army special operations bulletin.

Under the CCP, these same strategies are employed directly in its military strategy. The communist regime’s “Three Warfares” concept uses psychological warfare, media warfare (to spread propaganda), and legal warfare (to manipulate legal systems), według a 2015 raport from U.S. Dowództwo Operacji Specjalnych.

It notes that under the CCP, “media warfare seeks to influence domestic and international public opinion to build support for military actions and dissuade adversaries from actions contrary to China’s interests,” while legal warfare “uses international and domestic law to claim the legal high ground or assert Chinese interests.”

Subversive Movements

The goals of the CCP’s political warfare operations, and its agents of choice, need to be examined in context.

Carrying out visible, “overt,” and technically legal intelligence operations requires the use of foreign agents of influence, who are typically recruited from the diaspora of the regime’s citizens living abroad or from devotees to the regime’s ideology.

The main culprit of political warfare used to be Russia under the Soviet Union. Its main tools for these operations were its ideological supporters in foreign societies—journalists, professors, and activist community organizers, for example.

It recruited these often unofficial “agents of influence” through ideological subversion, converting them into believers of its communist doctrine. Fisher said that “by and large, the Soviet ground force was ideologically inclined,” since the Soviets did not have major ethnic communities around the globe they could call upon.

This differs from Russian political warfare operations today, which are comparatively limited in scope. Its supporters are typically region-locked, in Eastern European states, and only among the ethnic Russian communities.

Most of its political warfare operations further abroad, such as in the United States, are carried out by smaller numbers of more official spies, and through electronic means—such as online state media, social media posts, and cyberattacks.

The CCP, jednak, maintains agents from both its ethnic diaspora and supporters of its ideology, in levels close to those the Soviets had during the Cold War. The key difference, according to Fisher, is what they’re aiming to accomplish and what steps they’re taking to achieve their goals.

Zgodnie z 2013 raport from the Council on Foreign Relations, the United States used to run and counter such operations, but “the U.S. government has gotten out of the habit of waging political warfare since the end of the Cold War.”

The Long-Term Objective

The CCP’s political warfare systems are still under the influence of a faction led by former CCP leader Jiang Zemin, who officially ruled the Party from 1989 do 2002. Jiang’s faction still has sway over several key regime organs—such as propaganda and security—and has put the current leader, Xi Jinping, in a life and death struggle.

The objectives of Jiang’s system differ in several ways from past political warfare systems. The Soviet Union’s political warfare operations, for example, were aimed more directly at destabilizing foreign societies in order to foment communist revolution, and thereby export its political and ideological model.

The CCP’s political warfare goals, jednak, aren’t as simple, and according to Fisher, they appear to be playing out in two stages.

The first stage, powiedział, is to grow the CCP’s political and economic power globally, and to “promote the notion and to convince most of the world of the inevitability of China’s rise.” The communist regime will continue this stage, powiedział, until it is able to displace the United States as the “central political and strategic authority around the globe.”

If it can achieve that goal, it will move to the second phase of exporting its authoritarian “China model” of governance. Fisher said at this stage, its operations “would be much closer to the Soviet method of ‘active measures,’ which would mean going out and defending the China model—attacking and defeating all opposition to China’s position.”

Przeczytaj cały artykuł tutaj

15220086_587481194786303_6011597163027712910_n-115220086_587481194786303_6011597163027712910_n-1

Washington Dowody przymusowego pobierania organów dużej liczby praktykujących Falun Gong w Chinach nadal zamontować.

Ostatni rok, dwa raporty zostały opublikowane że rozszerzyliśmy naszą obraz skali i metody tej zbrodni. „Krwawe żniwa / The Slaughter-aktualizacji”Przez badaczy David Matas, David Kilgour, i Ethan Gutmann został wydany czerwca 22 w Waszyngtonie, D.C.. Ten raport zawiera szczegółowe dowody ogromnej liczby przeszczepów narządów zachodzących w chińskich szpitalach. To przeanalizował przychody szpitala, Liczy się łóżko i wskaźniki wykorzystania, personel chirurgiczne i inne dane i doszedł do wniosku, że Chiny wykonujący 60,000 do 100,000 przeszczepów rocznie, znacznie przekraczając twierdzenia chińskiego rządu o 10,000 na rok.

Drugi raport, „Raport Podsumowanie Przestępczości Live grabieży organów w Chinach,”Przez Światową Organizację do Zbadania Prześladowań Falun Gong (WOIPFG), została opublikowana w sierpniu. Zapewnia bogate dowody, że pozyskiwanie narządów jest zaaranżowana z najwyższych szczeblach rządu chińskiego i nie jest przestępstwem tylko niektórych nieuczciwych szpitalach i nieetycznych lekarzy. Raport WOIPFG twierdzi, że pozyskiwanie narządów jest stanem usankcjonowane zbrodnia na masową skalę, co się dzieje w tej chwili, z zamiarem zabicia praktykujących Falun Gong, tradycyjna chińska dyscyplina duchowa, którzy nie wyrzec wiary.

Teraz przychodzi drugą główną za film dokumentalny WOIPFG, „zbierający Alive - Dziesięć lat badań,”Którego próbki głównych ustaleń swoim raporcie z ostatniego roku.

Słysząc rzeczywisty audio wysokiego szczebla Komunistycznej Partii Chin (CCP) urzędnicy, Lekarze i personel szpitala nonszalancko mówić o swojej roli w przymusowego pobierania organów niewinnych więźniów sumienia dostarcza przerażające przekonanie, że wydrukowana strona raportu WOIPFG nie może zbliżyć się do oddziaływania emocjonalnego.

Pan. Li Jun (R), reżyser i producent, Nagrody nagradzany Dokumentalne,

Pan. Li Jun (R), reżyser i producent, Nagrody nagradzany Dokumentalne, „Alive zbierająca, 10 Lata Śledcze,”odpowiada na pytania po angielskiej premierze filmu dokumentalnego, czerwiec 23, w budynku Kongresu w Waszyngtonie, D.C.. Do jego prawo jest dr. Peng Tao, który jest koproducentem tego filmu zdobywcy nagrody. (Gary Feuerberg / Epoch Times)

Kinematografia wygrał Nagrody Dokumentalny najlepszy reżyser Hollywood Międzynarodowy Niezależny i funkcja zagraniczny film dokumentalny na styczeń 2017.

WOIPFG powstała sty. 20, 2003. Jego deklarowanym celem jest zbadanie i narazić przestępczego zachowania jednostek i organizacji zaangażowanych w prześladowania Falun Gong. Poszukiwany twarde dane, aby jego sprawy, WOIPFG zbadano ponad 865 szpitali i ponad 9500 Lekarze w Chinach.

Język angielski premiera filmu odbyła się na Kapitolu w Izbie Reprezentantów Rayburn Biurowiec, w czerwcu 23. Producent i reżyser Li Jun, koproducent Dr. Peng Tao, i dr. Wang Zhiyuan, który opowiada film, byli obecni na pokazie i odpowiadał na pytania publiczności. urzędnicy WOIPFG i Ethan Gutmann, jeden z głównych badaczy żywych zbiorów narządów w Chinach, również mówił przed projekcją.

Na krótko przed obszarem USA. premiera, Film stał dostępne do oglądania w Internecie. Ten film i oryginalna chińska wersja językowa zostały wyprodukowane przez Deerpark Productions, przy czym te ostatnie uwalniane w listopadzie. 2016.

Szpital Boiler Room „Cremations”

Gospodarzem filmu jest dr. Wang Zhiyuan, którego słowa są tłumaczone. dr. Wang spędził 30 lat jako lekarz wojskowy lotnictwo w Chinach, a potem na terenie Stanów Zjednoczonych. w 1995 do prowadzenia badań w chorobie sercowo-naczyniowej w Harvard School of Public Health. Był założycielem WOIPFG, i jest jej prezesem. W filmie, mówi, że po praktykujących medycynę i ratowania życia na 30 roku, nigdy nie wyobrażałem sobie, że on poświęcić następny 10 lat bada lekarzy biorących życie niewinnych ludzi.

dr. Wang Zhiyuan, założyciel i prezes Światowej Organizacji do Zbadania Prześladowań Falun Gong (WOIPFG), mówi na forum, które odbyło się w budynku Kongresu w Waszyngtonie, D.C., przymusowej zbiorem narządów w Chinach, czerwiec 23. (Gary Feuerberg / Epoch Times)

dr. Wang Zhiyuan, założyciel i prezes Światowej Organizacji do Zbadania Prześladowań Falun Gong (WOIPFG), mówi na forum, które odbyło się w budynku Kongresu w Waszyngtonie, D.C., przymusowej zbiorem narządów w Chinach, czerwiec 23. (Gary Feuerberg / Epoch Times)

W filmie, Wang powiedział, że jego życie zmieniło się na zawsze marca 9, 2006, gdy usłyszał zarzuty wielkoskalowych pobierania organów więźniów Falun Gong podczas żyli w szpitalu Sujiatun zakrzepicy Shenyang. Kobieta za pomocą alias „Annie” twierdził byłego męża, chirurg oko napędzany przez poczucie winy, wyznał jej, że miał ekstrakcji rogówki od ponad 2,000 Praktykujący Falun Gong.

Wang, który był sceptyczny, powiedział, że on i jego koledzy zdecydowali WOIPFG muszą badać dalej. Szukali dowodów, ale lekarze i pielęgniarki w szpitalu Sujiatun było żadnej pomocy. Następnie Wang nazywany sali szpitalnej kotłowni i dowiedział się, że zwłoki palono tam. Z własnego doświadczenia, sądził, że był najbardziej niezwykły jak pacjenci zmarli są zazwyczaj przeniesione do kostnicy szpitalnej i wysłał do domu pogrzebowego na kremację.

Wang uważał, że [spalania zwłok w szpitalu kotłowni] było najbardziej niezwykłe jak zwykle pacjenci zmarli zostaną przeniesione do kostnicy szpitalnej i wysłał do domu pogrzebowego na kremację.

Wang znaleźć to kwestia niepokojąca i tak opiera się na nim, a pozostałe zarzuty w Sujiatun, on i jego koledzy zaczęli WOIPFG wstępne dochodzenie. WOIPFG badacze w 2006-2007 nazywa 23 Szpitale w Chinach z pytaniem, czy nie było narządy wątroby dostępne od praktykujących Falun Gong. W filmie, słyszymy nagranie mar. 6, 2006 lekarza z Uniwersytetu Fudan w Szanghaju, Zhongshan Szpital Transplant Center, odpowiadać, „Wszystko, co mamy, to tego typu.”

High Level CCP Urzędnicy know

badacze WOIPFG, udając pracy z innych biur CCP, wywołało kilka zdań przez telefon z urzędników wysokiego szczebla, który bez wiedzy kim oni naprawdę rozmawiasz, przyznał i potwierdził swoje zaangażowanie w zbiorze narządów. Oto kilka przykładów z filmu dokumentalnego.

Tang Jun, Wiceprezes, Prowincja Liaoning polityczna & Komisja Prawna, został poproszony o zamówieniach do podjęcia narządów od praktykujących Falun Gong do gabinetów przeszczepie. Powiedział, „Byłem odpowiedzialny za ten. The [CCP] Centralny Komitet faktycznie zarządzający ten problem, i miał szeroki wpływ.”Tang powiedział również, że sprawa była omawiana na posiedzeniach Komitetu Centralnego.

Li Changchun, Członek Biura Politycznego Stały, został poproszony o Bo Xilai, kto, tydzień wcześniej, przyszedł badany przez dyscypliny Komitetu KPCh. Gdy rozmówca (WOIPFG badacz) zapytał kwietnia 17, 2012 Bo o udział w przestępstwie organów żniwny z praktykujących Falun Gong, Li odpowiedział natychmiast, „Zhou Yongkang jest odpowiedzialny za ten; wie; pójść poprosić go.”

Zhou Yongkang był w tym czasie członkiem Biura Politycznego Komitetu Stałego, Najważniejszym organem podejmującym decyzję w chińskim reżimem. Komunalnymi cara bezpieczeństwa, Zhou dzierżył ogromną moc w ogóle, a konkretnie nad zatrzymanymi Falun Gong w obozach koncentracyjnych. Później został skazany w czerwcu 2015 na dożywocie w sprawie zmian związanych z korupcją.

Gdy aktywny w Stałym Komitecie, Zhou był kiedyś zapytany przez badaczy o więcej niż 20 praktykujący Falun Gong, którzy uciekli z posterunku wojskowego (to znaczy, obóz koncentracyjny). Nie był w zaprzeczeniu lub zaskoczony, i powiedział, że będzie się badać, Według dyrektora WOIPFG za świadomość społeczna Dr. Charles Lee, który mówił na forum Capitol.

Badacze WOIPFG odegrała starannego podstęp na obsłudze członek Biura Politycznego Stały Komitet Zhang Gaoli dostać go nieświadomie potwierdza zasadę rolę Jiang Zemina w zbiorze narządów milionów żywych praktykujących Falun Gong. Jiang, byłego szefa KPCh, rozpoczął prześladowania Falun Gong lipca 20, 1999, i zmusił innych członków Politbiura, aby przejść wraz z jego życzeniem.

WOIPFG wiedział, kiedy Zhang byłby poza granice kraju w Kazachstanie. Po Zhang przybył i zameldowaliśmy się w hotelu, WOIPFG badacz nazwał go, udając „Sekretarz Liu,”, Która pracuje w biurze Jiang Zemina. Badacz powiedział Zhang, że dziesiątki tysięcy praktykujących Falun Gong wniósł skargi karnego przeciwko Jiang na Prokuratury Najwyższego Ludowej do zbioru narządów milionów praktykujących Falun Gong, i że przedmiot zostanie wychowany na następnym posiedzeniu Politbiura. W nagraniu, Zhang zapytał, czy mógłby powstrzymać go od dyskusji i dochodzenia. Słyszymy odpowiedź głosową Zhang, "Tak! tak!”

WOIPFG badacz powtarza cztery razy, że Jiang nakazał zbieranie narządów milionów żywych praktykujących Falun Gong i że odpowiedzialność była bardzo poważna. Bez zastrzeżeń lub niezgodności, Zhang obiecał mu zapobiec dochodzenie i powiedział rozmówcę do opowiedzenia Jiang nie martwić. Skończył rozmowę chcącego Jiang długiego życia i dobrego zdrowia.

Wszystkie nagrania telefoniczne są oznaczone tagiem wpływy z firm telefonicznych z czasem, Numery telefonów i czas trwania zwany. Głosy urzędników wysokiego szczebla w nagraniach można porównać do ich głosy dostępne w Internecie i gdzie indziej i zweryfikowane przez laboratoriach akustycznych, stany WOIPFG.

Całkowicie, WOIPFG posiada nagrania jako dowód, że organ grabieże w Chinach jest przestępstwem, które jest kierowane przez CCP i prowadzone przez wojsko, instytucje państwowe, szpitale, i przedsiębiorstwa, transplantacja.

Powyższe jest tylko kilka przykładowych nagrań dotyczących wiedzy i wpływu urzędników wysokiego szczebla w ogromnej państwowej usankcjonowane przestępstwa w zabójstwie tysięcy praktykujących od 2000. Jest więcej dowodów w filmie dokumentalnym o innych aspektach przestępczości.

Straż policja wychodzi

Zanotowanego wywiad jest szczególnie szokujące i chłodzenie. To właśnie z jedyną rzeczywistą świadka makabrycznej operacji w filmie. W szpitalu wojskowym w Shenyang, uzbrojony ochroniarz z prowincji Liaoning świadkiem zabijania praktyków dla ich organów 2002.

Co ochroniarz opisany był „zbyt obrazowo straszne,„Prezydent powiedział WOIPFG Wang Zhiyuan, i powiedział, że cierpiała na bezsenność i depresję po wysłuchaniu zeznań. W 2009, sumienie ochroniarza za przeszkadza mu, a więc skontaktował WOIPFG, z którymi był w kontakcie przez ponad miesiąc. Ochroniarz przypomniał świadkami dwóch lekarzy wojskowych wyodrębnieniu serce, wątroba, rogówka, a mózg („Zasysane miąższ mózgu out”) z wciąż żywego żeńskiej praktykującego Falun Gong bez użycia znieczulenia.

Był świadkiem dwóch lekarzy wyodrębnieniu serce, wątroba, rogówka, a mózg z kobiecej praktykującego Falun Gong bez użycia znieczulenia.

„Gdy nóż dotknął jej piersi, krzyknęła, „Falun Dafa Hao,„”, Co oznacza, Falun Dafa jest dobre. Serce zostało wykute pierwszy. Była torturowana pałkami elektrycznymi na tydzień, powiedział. Wang stwierdził, że to nie była normalna operacja, ale zamiast tego jest „kontynuacją torturowania praktykujących Falun Gong”.

Dlaczego Premiere na terenie Stanów Zjednoczonych. Kapitał

Li Jun, reżyser i producent „eksploatowane Żyjący,”Powiedział po projekcji, że świadomie wybrał stolicę Stanów Zjednoczonych, Waszyngton, D.C., a obszarem USA. Kongres trzymać premiera angielskiego. Mówienie przez tłumacza powiedział, „Jest to bardzo oczywiste, że to przestępstwo [z grabieży narządów od praktykujących Falun Gong na masową skalę] Stan jest usankcjonowane przez CCP. Chcemy patenty USA. Rząd jako światowego lidera, aby coś z tym zrobić.”

dr. Peng Tao, współ-producentem „eksploatowane Żyjący,”Ma nadzieję, że film pozwoli każdemu«zrozumieć zbrodnie popełnione KPCh i musimy go zatrzymać.»

dr. Wang wyraził frustrację, że świat nie zwraca zbytniej uwagi na to co dzieje się w Chinach. „To wstyd dla ludzkiego. Dlatego chciałem powiedzieć patenty USA. rząd i cały świat, powinniśmy naprawdę pracować, aby to powstrzymać.”

Jeśli choć połowa z zastrzeżeń dokonanych przez dokumencie są prawdziwe, musimy zadzwonić handlu narządami w Chinach naprawdę barbarzyńskie i zbrodnia przeciwko ludzkości.

- kongresmen Chris Smith (R N.J.), list, czerwiec 23, 2017

Kongresmen Chris Smith (R N.J.), współprzewodniczący Komisji Wykonawczej Kongresu Chin (CECC), Napisałem list do odczytania na pokazie premierowym „eksploatowane przy życiu.” Obserwując, że odbyła się rozprawa w tej sprawie w 1998, Rozpustnik. Smith powiedział, że handel organami dla zysku został dzieje się w Chinach od dwóch dekad i że dowody w dokumencie pokazuje, że niewiele się zmieniło.

„Jeśli nawet połowę wniosków złożonych przez dokumencie są prawdziwe, musimy zadzwonić handlu narządami w Chinach naprawdę barbarzyńskie i zbrodnia przeciwko ludzkości „.

Rozpustnik. Smith kontynuował, „Musimy wspólny wysiłek, aby zatrzymać tę barbarzyńską praktykę w Chinach i na całym świecie.”

dr. Wang powiedział, że w tym miesiącu czerwcu, szpital w prowincji Jilin jest rozdawaniu przeszczep wątroby 10 dzieci. (Zauważył, że w kwietniu 28, 2006, szpital w prowincji Hunan, gdzie prześladowania Falun Gong było szczególnie dotkliwe, prowadził promocję zapowiadający 20 wolne przeszczepy wątroby lub nerki.) Wang powiedział, że szpital w „oddać” może oznaczać tylko obfitość narządów i bardzo dużą pulę dostępnych dla praktyków być zbierane i zabity.

W Stanach Zjednoczonych. który ma znacznie bardziej dojrzały system dawstwa narządów, czas oczekiwania na narząd wątroby jest dwa do trzech lat. W Chinach, jednak, czas oczekiwania wynosi jeden do dwóch tygodni.

Pytany przez The Epoch Times, co jest za wolna narządów, Wang powiedział, "Myślę [CCP] bardzo prawdopodobne, chce wyeliminować wszystkie praktykujących Falun Gong, którzy nadal pozostają w obozach koncentracyjnych, tak szybko, jak to możliwe.”

Dane Tipping Point

Ethan Gutmann powiedział dotyczące miniony rok, 2016-2017, że dwa raporty wspomniałem na początku tego artykułu były znaczące dla potęgi surowych danych i przyniosły na „globalnego punktu krytycznego” w przyjęciu żywo pobierania organów. Odnosząc się do transplantacji wątroby awaryjnego omówione w filmie, powiedział, „Jest stabilny ludzi gotowych na śmierć”. Nie ma wątpliwości, że jest żywo zbioru narząd dzieje, powiedział.

Ethan Gutmann, pisarz i autor śledczy

Ethan Gutmann, pisarz śledczy i autor „The Slaughter (1914) i jego 2016 aktualizacje, uczestniczy w forum na przymusowe pobierania organów od więźniów sumienia. Impreza odbyła się na Kapitolu, Waszyngton, D.C., czerwiec 23. (Leo Shi / Epoch Times)

Gutmann, który jest również autorem z 2014 Książka „The Slaughter,”Zauważył, że oba raporty otrzymał rygorystycznej kontroli przez naukowców z CECC. Po poświęcając dwa miesiące kontroli nad źródłami, Naukowcy CECC uwierzytelnione dokumenty, Gutmann który powiedział było świadectwem ich ważności.

Zmuszony do zbioru narządów w Chinach zyskała powszechną akceptację w ubiegłym roku, Gutmann powiedział. Organizacje praw człowieka Freedom House oraz raport Amnesty International na nim teraz, a nawet New York Times, który zignorował ten problem przez ponad dekadę, jest teraz raportowanie na nim, on dodał.

Przeczytaj cały artykuł tutaj